Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2
1
Hot Stuff Discussion / Re: Progressivism kind of you
« Last post by Citizen on January 06, 2018, 09:57:41 pm »
I do like sports 50 per cent of whole me.  8)
2
Hot Stuff Discussion / Re: Progressivism kind of you
« Last post by Citizen on January 06, 2018, 09:42:08 pm »
Thank you Mod for this topic I prefer this thing and I do like.  8) 8)
3
Hot Stuff Discussion / Progressivism kind of you
« Last post by Arvola on January 06, 2018, 09:29:36 pm »
I am not progressive but otherwises are maybe.
4
Warfare / NH-90
« Last post by Citizen on January 02, 2018, 06:17:29 pm »
Is standard helicopter in Sweden and Germany at least.

5
World News / Western civilisation could collapse
« Last post by Citizen on January 02, 2018, 04:15:00 pm »
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20170418-how-western-civilisation-could-collapse

A part of quetos right here:

Quote
That economic stratification may lead to collapse on its own, on the other hand, came as more of a surprise to Motesharrei and his colleagues. Under this scenario, elites push society toward instability and eventual collapse by hoarding huge quantities of wealth and resources, and leaving little or none for commoners who vastly outnumber them yet support them with labour. Eventually, the working population crashes because the portion of wealth allocated to them is not enough, followed by collapse of the elites due to the absence of labour. The inequalities we see today both within and between countries already point to such disparities. For example, the top 10% of global income earners are responsible for almost as much total greenhouse gas emissions as the bottom 90% combined. Similarly, about half the world’s population lives on less than $3 per day. 

For both scenarios, the models define a carrying capacity – a total population level that a given environment’s resources can sustain over the long term. If the carrying capacity is overshot by too much, collapse becomes inevitable. That fate is avoidable, however. “If we make rational choices to reduce factors such as inequality, explosive population growth, the rate at which we deplete natural resources and the rate of pollution – all perfectly doable things – then we can avoid collapse and stabilise onto a sustainable trajectory,” Motesharrei said. “But we cannot wait forever to make those decisions.”

On the other hand, Western societies may not meet with a violent, dramatic end. In some cases, civilisations simply fade out of existence – becoming the stuff of history not with a bang but a whimper. The British Empire has been on this path since 1918, Randers says, and other Western nations might go this route as well. As time passes, they will become increasingly inconsequential and, in response to the problems driving their slow fade-out, will also starkly depart from the values they hold dear today. “Western nations are not going to collapse, but the smooth operation and friendly nature of Western society will disappear, because inequity is going to explode,” Randers argues. “Democratic, liberal society will fail, while stronger governments like China will be the winners.”
Some of these forecasts and early warning signs should sound familiar, precisely because they are already underway. While Homer-Dixon is not surprised at the world’s recent turn of events – he predicted some of them in his 2006 book – he didn’t expect these developments to occur before the mid-2020s.
Western civilisation is not a lost cause, however. Using reason and science to guide decisions, paired with extraordinary leadership and exceptional goodwill, human society can progress to higher and higher levels of well-being and development, Homer-Dixon says. Even as we weather the coming stresses of climate change, population growth and dropping energy returns,...

This aren't true facts BBC have coming with or you disapear over my hard work?

Are China the only superpower in about 2 years in economics and military power?
6
Healthcare / Healthcare 2015 top running
« Last post by Citizen on December 26, 2017, 06:20:30 pm »
Healthcare Cost per Capita:

16.9 percent in USA.
11.2 percent in Japan.
11,1 percent in Germany.
11,1 percent in Sweden.
11,0 percent in France.
10,1 percent in Canada.
9,8 percent in United Kingdom.
9,3 percent in Australia.

It facts in work studie.

 8)
7
Other Sports / Points by NHL players
« Last post by Citizen on December 26, 2017, 05:58:18 am »
Top six stars:

1. Kucherov TBL - 51 P
2. Tavares NYI - 46
3. Bailey NYI - 46
4. Stamkos TBL - 45
5. Voracek PHI - 44
6. McDavid EDM - 43
8
Warfare / Re: Defence spend EU
« Last post by Citizen on December 26, 2017, 02:59:19 am »
2009 it whering cirka 271 $ Billion.

2016 it whering cirka 250 $ Billion.

In whole EU military spending.
9
Warfare / Defence spend EU
« Last post by Citizen on December 26, 2017, 01:34:02 am »
"Take Europe’s largest economy: By 2020, Germany will spend 53 percent more on equipment compared to 2016, according to a German defense ministry estimate.

Across Europe, as much as €97 billion of additional spending could become available annually by 2024 if all of the 28 current EU members plus NATO ally Norway spend the recommended NATO target of 2 percent of GDP on defense, a McKinsey study released last month forecast. At least one-fifth of that sum — more than €19 billion — should be spent on equipment, the consultancy firm said in a joint report with the Munich Security Conference.


Although the idea of all these countries reaching the 2 percent goal — which is also endorsed by the EU’s new military pact — in that timeframe seems unrealistic, there is little doubt that equipment spending will surge in the years ahead.

Some of that money will go on filling existing gaps, such as the lack of air-to-air refueling capability. But analysts suggest a large chunk should flow into digitizing armed forces — upgrading software and increasing bandwidth to make sure that, even in remote areas, troops are not cut off from interconnected weapons systems driven by virtual networks.
"

https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-defense-spending-challenge-new-transatlantic-order/
10
World News / Officially, Prince Albert’s father was Ernest I Duke Of Saxe
« Last post by Citizen on December 26, 2017, 01:03:44 am »
"The pair married in 1817, and they quickly had two children: Ernest II and Albert.

However, during their marriage, Ernest had plenty of affairs and fathered at least three illegitimate children – and there were rumours that Louise also engaged in extra-marital relationships.

Ernest eventually divorced Louise on grounds of adultery - which suggests there is a possibility that Albert was illegitimate.

But, Albert’s biographer Hector Bolitho, who closely examined the couple’s divorce papers, found “there was not even a hint in the documents that the Duchess had been unfaithful, until at least four years after Prince Albert was born.


https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4488916/prince-alberts-father-illegitimate-uncle-leopold-princess-louise-affair/
Pages: [1] 2